The Star Trek Story

The following article is from the bookUncle John’s Bathroom Reader Tunes Into TV.

TV’s Star Trek franchise was a four-decade-long roller-coaster ride, beginning with two different shows helmed by two very different men- Gene Roddenberry and Rick Berman. Here’s their behind-the-scenes story.

Macho Man

In his youth, Gene Roddenberry was a lot like Captain Kirk- always looking for adventure. As a teenager, he wanted to be a cop and even volunteered for the FBI. In World War II, he became a decorated bomber pilot who completed 89 missions in the Pacific. After the war, Captain Roddenberry was piloting a Pan Am passenger jet over the Syrian desert when the plane lost an engine and crashed. He fought off looting nomads to keep his passengers safe until help arrived.

One day in the mid-1950s, Roddenberry, now a motorcycle cop, walked into a Hollywood restaurant and interrupted a group of TV producers at a lunch meeting. He dropped one of his scripts on the table and said, “You’ll want to read this.” It was an unconventional, swaggering way to get his foot in the door… and it worked.

Wagon Trek

By 1964, Roddenberry was a successful TV writer, having written dozens of scripts for successful TV Westerns (Have Gun – Will Travel) and police dramas (Highway Patrol). But his goal was to get a show he created on the air, and he already had the first piece of the puzzle- a great idea. From his official pitch:

Star Trek is a new kind of television science fiction series. The format will be “Wagon Train to the Stars”- built around characters who travel to other worlds and meet the jeopardy and adventure which become our stories.

Studio after studio said no. “Too risky,” one executive said, “too smart. And way too expensive to produce every week.” In the 1960s, TV sci-fi was more fantasy than science-fiction; there was little attempt at realism- with either the science or the storylines. Combining a space adventure with serious drama was unheard of. But Roddenberry knew there was an audience for it.

Gene Loves Lucy

Having been rejected by the major TV studios, Roddenberry turned to a smaller one, Desilu. There he succeeded. Although Herbert Solow, Desilu’s vice president, wasn’t completely sold on the Star Trek idea, he thought Roddenberry had great promise as a writer/producer and convinced his boss, Oscar Katz, to sign him to a three-year deal.

The studio needed a hit- its only show in production at that time was The Lucy Show, Lucille Ball herself (Desilu’s president) convinced Katz to allow Roddenberry to pitch Star Trek to the networks, saying, “There aren’t smart shows on TV.” So Roddenberry went to CBS, home of The Lucy Show. After an impassioned, two-hour presentation, network president James Aubrey Jr. thanked Roddenberry for his time but turned down Star Trek because the network was already developing a similar show: Lost in Space. A meeting with ABC also ended in rejection. The only stop left: NBC.

This time, Roddenberry got the go-ahead. Mort Werner, NBC’s vice president of programming, shelled out $500,000 to produce a pilot. Called “The Cage,” it starred Jeffrey Hunter as Captain Christopher Pike and Majel Barrett as his female second-in-command. (There was also an alien character with pointy ears played by Leonard Nimoy.) Werner was impressed by the storytelling, the drama, the acting, and the attention to detail, but still said no to a series, using the same “too smart” and “too expensive” logic that Roddenberry had heard so many times.

But there was a glimmer of hope. Werner allowed Roddenberry to film a second pilot- with a few changes: 1) find a younger, better-looking actor to play the captain, 2) demote the woman and 3) get rid of the “pointy-eared guy.”

A Reflection of the Times

Roddenberry was dismayed about the changes but elated about having a second chance, so he compromised. William Shatner came in as Captain Kirk (replacing Pike), and Barrett was recast as Nurse Chapel. But Roddenberry refused to relinquish the “Vulcan” character. And he made one other change without informing NBC: He added a female African-American officer to the bridge.

Roddenberry wanted Star Trek to reflect modern, progressive culture. Uhura, played by Nichelle Nichols, became TV’s first black female character in a position of authority during the civil-rights movement. Racism, militarism, pacifism- few topics were taboo for the original Star Trek. And it was an intelligent show, thanks to some of the day’s best sci-fi writers, including Harlan Ellison, Theodore Sturgeon, and David Gerrold (who would become best known for writing the episode “The Trouble with Tribbles”). Whereas other space shows (like Lost in Space) featured mindless monsters, Star Trek aired an episode about a “Horta” -a rock-like thing that turned out to be a mother protecting her young.

Stardate 1513.1

Star Trek premiered on September 8, 1966, and a whopping 40 percent of American homes tuned in. The size of the audience may have been because NBC launched their fall season a week before the other networks; CBS and ABC were airing reruns. When competitors put new shows against Star Trek, ratings dropped. By the end of the season, it ranked a disappointing #52. Desilu’s Katz wanted to cancel it, but again Lucille Ball exerted her power to keep it in production for another year. At the end of the second season, NBC was all set to cancel the show, no matter what Ball said -it was losing badly to CBS’s Gomer Pyle USMC– but Trek’s small, rabid fan base mounted a massive letter-writing campaign to keep it on the air. The show was saved again.

Ratings, however, did not improve. NBC never knew how to market Star Trek, or to whom- it was too grown-up for the Monkees audience and too far-out for the Gunsmoke crowd. Plus, Roddenberry constantly battled NBC and soon Paramount, which bought out Desilu, over everything from budgets to hemlines. Even the actors were fighting with each other (Shatner frequently stole lines from his castmates) and with Roddenberry (over scheduling and appearance fees).

By the third season, the budget was severely cut and the show’s quality suffered. NBC was ready to let it go. The network put Star Trek in the slot where shows go to die: Friday night at 10 p.m. The final episode aired on June 3, 1969, a month and a half before the moon landing.

Tooning In

Then something strange happened. Reruns of Star Trek in the mid-’70s attracted new fans and the show suddenly became a phenomenon. Fans assembled at Star Trek conventions, and spin-off novels were huge sellers in the sci-fi market. That proved to the brass at NBC that there was an audience for the show. Still, it was too risky to dive into another expensive production, and it would be too difficult to reassemble the cast to revive the series. So in 1973 NBC decided to make Star Trek into a Saturday morning cartoon.

Although it was cheaper to produce, Star Trek: The Animated Series was by no means a cheap knockoff. Roddenberry was still in charge; most of the original cast (including Shatner and Nimoy) voiced their characters; and veteran writers D.C. Fontana and David Gerrold wrote scripts. As many adults as kids turned in, but there weren’t enough of either to keep it on the air. Though the show was well received, NBC canceled it after two seasons.

Phase II, Engage

With reruns of Star Trek‘s original 79 episodes still performing strongly in 1977, Paramount asked Roddenberry to develop a second live-action series. Called Star Trek: Phase II, it was to be a revival of the original series, with Shatner, Nichols, and other case members (but not Nimoy- he was committed to starring in Equus on Broadway). Sets were built, scripts were written, and contracts were signed. Paramount even envisioned Phase II as the linchpin of the Paramount Television Service, a new broadcast network it was developing.

And then Star Wars was released.

Not only did Star Wars become one of the highest-grossing movies of all time, it renewed interest in big-screen science fiction, which hadn’t been popular in a decade. Paramount saw bigger dollar signs on the big screen, so they retooled Phase II into 1979’s Star Trek: The Motion Picture. That decision launched a big-screen Trek franchise that spawned four movies and earned a half a billion dollars at the box office over the next nine years. The movies were such a success that in 1986 Paramount once again called on Gene Roddenberry to create a live-action television series.

Roddenberry decided he needed someone who knew not only how to get a show on the air but how to keep it on the air. His preferred choice for a producer was Harve Bennett, the man who wrote Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn, but Bennett was too busy working on the Trek film series.

That’s when Roddenberry was told that he should talk to a young man rising up through the ranks at Paramount: Rick Berman.

Generation Next

If Gene Roddenberry personifies Captain Kirk, then Rick Berman takes after Captain Picard. Whereas Roddenberry made action shows, Berman made PBS kids’ shows such as Big Blue Marble, as well as the very intellectual documentary Space. And Berman was coming into his own as a producer, having worked on ratings giants Cheers, MacGyver, and Webster. One thing Berman wasn’t: a Star Trek fan. Roddenberry didn’t mind- the new show was going to take place 80 years after the original series, and he thought that it should look and feel different from the 1960s version.

But from the get-go, Berman’s relationship with Roddenberry was tumultuous. Their first major clash concerned putting a “bald Englishman” on the bridge of the Enterprise. Roddenberry agreed that Captain Kirk’s “cowboy diplomacy” should be toned down for the new show, but he didn’t like Berman’s choice for the role of Captain Picard: classically trained Patrick Stewart. Nearly everyone else did, however, and Berman finally talked Roddenberry into it.

In September 1987, the two-hour premiere of Star Trek: The Next Generation attracted a massive 27 million viewers. Paramount’s gamble had paid off. For the first time in nearly two decades, a new live-action Star Trek series was on TV.

But it wasn’t very good (at first).

Number One, This is Number Two

As new producers, writers, and actors found their way, the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation was uneven. Despite TNG’s flaws, hardcore Trek fans kept tuning in, hoping it would get better. Few people, including the stars, expected the show to last. “We were all very nervous,” said Levar Burton, who played Lt. Commander Geordi La Forge. “We felt that we were stepping into such big shoes that we took it, and perhaps ourselves, too seriously.”

The entire concept of Star Trek: TNG was at odds with itself: It needed to have its own identity, but it also needed to piggyback on the legacy of the original series. Except for a brief cameo by Deforest Kelley as an elderly Dr. McCoy in the pilot, Roddenberry didn’t allow any of the original actors to reprise their roles… but he did recycle plots and ideas from the old series.

King Lear in Space

But Roddenberry was also nixing the edgier scripts. Head writer David Gerrold wrote an allegorical episode called “Blood and Fire,” about the AIDS epidemic. Roddenberry rejected it. Gerrold and fellow writer D.C. Fontana quit after the first season because of office politics, and so did more than 30 other staffers, still a television record.

Roddenberry was increasingly suffering from heart trouble by the time the second season began, although he still held sway over the writers and actors. That gave Rick Berman an opportunity to take over. His first change was allowing actor Patrick Stewart to have more input on his character. Stewart, who’d trained with the Royal Shakespeare Company, had taken the role not because he was particularly interested in science fiction, but because he wanted to portray the inner struggle of a man whose duty was to protect hundreds of lives. As he put it, “I wanted to be King Lear in space.”

Then, against Roddenberry’s wishes, Berman approved the script for “The Measure of a Man,” in which Starfleet orders the android Data to be disassembled and studied, and Picard must defend Data’s “humanity.” The episode was the first time Stewart got to sink his teeth into the role. “I was very happy to finally have a chance to take on some serious issues,” he said. Brent Spiner (Data) was happy, too- he’d had an equally difficult time with his one-note role and credits Berman with allowing him to “find Data.” Things started to get easier for the cast and crew.

The Finest Fleet in the Galaxy

In 1991, two major events occurred in the Star Trek world: Gene Roddenberry died at age 70, and The Next Generation became one of the most popular shows on television. The show’s stars reached celebrity status, too- especially Stewart, whom People magazine named the “sexiest man on TV.”

Under Berman, TNG won 18 Emmy Awards. And in 1994, it became the only syndicated show ever to be nominated for Outstanding Drama Series (it lost to Picket Fences).


As the series aged, however, the quality of the show occasionally suffered. Some critics and viewers felt that Star Trek: TNG had become a victim of its own formula: give a crew member a personal crisis to deal with, introduce an alien with a forehead prosthetic to reflect on a thinly veiled human folly (greed, racism, etc.), and then put the ship in danger. TNG’s final two seasons revolved around stories like Commander Worf’s young son not wanting to be a warrior, and Dr. Crusher falling for a man who turns out to be an alien who once seduced her grandmother.

Despite the formulaic plots, rating for TNG remained high- so high, in fact, that Paramount executives Brandon Tartikoff ordered a new Trek spin-off in 1993. Tartikoff wanted a show about a father and son who travel through space helping people, but Berman and writing partner Michael Piller had other ideas. They kept the father-and-son angle (Avery Brooks as Captain Sisko and Cirroc Lofton as his boy, Jake) but put them on a remote outpost called Deep Space 9, located near a “wormhole” that very nasty aliens could get through.

Star Trek: Deep Space 9 went beyond TNG to deal with subjects that previous Star Treks had never explored in depth, including religious fanaticism, immigration and the franchise’s first same-sex kiss. And unlike The Next Generation, most of the characters didn’t get along, which heightened the drama. Like TNG, DS9 lasted for seven seasons.

Generation Gap

After Star Trek: The Next Generation ended in 1994, Picard, Data, and company were promoted to the big screen. At first, fans were excited to hear that the movie, Star Trek: Generations, would include Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. But Rick Berman, who produced the film and co-wrote the story, soon angered many of them. How? He killed off Captain Kirk.

When word leaked out before the movie’s release that Kirk was going to die, most fans assumed that he would go out in a blaze of glory, sacrificing himself for the ship. But his death, while it did help Picard defeat the bad guy (played by Malcolm McDowell), was, in a word, anticlimactic. What irked fans of the original series most was that, story-wise, Kirk didn’t have to die- the movie’s plot included a “temporal nexus” that Kirk could have gone to and never aged. All Berman had to do was put Kirk in there at the end of the movie. Said Leonard Nimoy, “To end with a fight scene between Kirk and Malcolm McDowell! What’s the point?”

Generations made more than $75 million at the box office but received mixed reviews. “It is predictably flabby and impenetrable in places,” wrote Janet Maslin of The New York Times. “But it has enough pomp, spectacle, and high-tech small talk to keep the franchise afloat.”

Captain Kate

Maslin was right. The franchise stayed afloat, and Paramount called on Berman to create a fourth Star Trek TV series. The result was Star Trek: Voyager, the first Trek series with a female captain. The concept: Captain Janeway (Kate Mulgrew) and her crew become stranded on the other side of the galaxy and must find their way home. This gave Berman and writers Michael Piller and Jeri Taylor an opportunity to invent new aliens and force the crew to survive without the help of “the mighty Federation.”

Enough viewers turned in to keep it going, but fewer than had watched Deep Space 9, and far fewer than for The Next Generation. And unlike the last two series, Voyager wasn’t syndicated; it was the flagship show for the new United Paramount Network (UPN). To build an entire network around a single show- especially a sci-fi show- was a gamble, but it proved just how big Star Trek had become.

The Seven of Nine Show

Studio bosses had left Berman alone on TNG and DS9; this time he found himself at the mercy of network executives. When they complained that the show wasn’t “sexy” enough, Berman was ordered to bring in curvy actress Jeri Ryan as Seven of Nine, a member of the Borg collective who is captured and rehabilitated by the Voyager crew. After the execs saw Ryan in her skin-tight-Borg costume- she looked like a half-human/half-robot with gray skin- they sent Berman a memo complaining that she was too sexy. Mulgrew complained to Berman about the switch, and he agreed but told her that “ordered were orders.”

The tactic paid off, though, because Voyager’s head writer, Brannon Braga, saw potential in the Seven of Nine character. Most Trek series had one nonhuman who helped the other characters learn about their own humanity. Spock filled that purpose in the first series; Data took that role in TNG. On Voyager, crew members- including the ship’s holographic doctor (Robert Picardo)- ended up teaching the cyborg Seven of Nine how to be human.

An Enterprising Idea

After Voyager‘s seven-year run ended in May 2001, Rick Berman begged Paramount to give Star Trek a one-year hiatus before launching another series. “It’s over saturated,” he argued. “People are losing interest.” They gave him until September.

The struggling UPN network needed viewers, and other than professional wrestling, Star Trek was its only bankable commodity. Berman and co-producer Brannon Braga decided to go back in time in the Trek universe and base a series on how it all began.

By Berman and Braga’s latest series, Enterprise, didn’t look much like any of the other Star Treks. It took place a century before the original series, and there was no Federation, no Prime Directive, and no carpeted bridge. This starship Enterprise looked like a submarine on the inside. Another change: Instead of typical symphonic theme that marked every other Trek incarnation, Enterprise opened with a rock ballad called “Where My Heart Will Take Me,” sung by opera singer Russel Watson.

Archer’s Gang

Enterprise premiered on UPN less than two weeks after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. More than 12 million viewers tuned in looking for a diversion from all the bad news- UPN’s biggest audience ever. And what they saw looked sort of like the familiar Star Trek– there was a Vulcan, played by supermodel Jolene Blalock, and there was a rugged Starfleet captain, Jonathon Archer (Scott Bakula).

Ratings dropped off for the second episode and continued to decline, but compared to other shows on UPN, Enterprise did fairly well. Some critics and die-hard Trek fans, though weren’t happy. What seemed to irritate them most was Berman’s indifference to Star Trek’s canon. For example: Trekkers know that the first captain of the Enterprise was Captain April, not Captain Archer. Plus, some of the familiar Trek villains, like the Cardassians, were missing.

Back to Basics

Even UPN execs noticed the lack of continuity, and they told Berman that if he wanted the show to survive, he’d have to “Trek it up.” By the fourth season (2004-05), Enterprise had finally become what fans were promised in the beginning: a direct prequel laying the foundation for what was to come. Berman wound plots around the franchise’s two most popular villains- the Klingons and the Romulans- and provided detailed explanations to correct continuity issues, such as why the Klingons on later Treks had bumpy foreheads while the original Klingons didn’t (a genetic mutation). Now the faithful could finally watch a real Star Trek! Well, they could have… if only they’d tuned in.

End of the Line

Much to Berman’s dismay, UPN put Enterprise in the infamous Friday-night “death slot,” where no show on a broadcast network had attracted a decent audience in more than a decade. In February 2005, UPN gave it the ax. While the majority of TV viewers barely noticed that Enterprise had even been on, much less canceled, some die-hard Trekkers are to this day livid at UPN (which folded in 2006). According to the fanzine Trekdom, “UPN suits cringed at the thought of intellectually challenging their Sweet Valley High, Moesha, and WWE Smackdown viewers. A network that thrived on fluff didn’t have a high tolerance level for provocative drama.”

Braga, who went on to oversee Fox’s 24, also blamed the network, “I think UPN hurt Voyager and much more with Enterprise, to be on a constantly shifting fledgling network that in some places was on channel 92, if you could find it, and you needed the foil rabbit ears.” Still, Berman says, “I have nothing to be ashamed about. We created 624 hours of television and four feature films and I think we did a hell of a job.”

[Ed. note: The Star Trek franchise now has 13 feature films. The new Star Trek TV series, Discovery, is set to debut September 24 on CBS, before moving to their CBS All Acess streaming service.]


The article above was reprinted with permission from Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader Tunes Into TV. Since 1988, the Bathroom Reader Institute had published a series of popular books containing irresistible bits of trivia and obscure yet fascinating facts.

If you like Neatorama, you’ll love the Bathroom Reader Institute’s books – go ahead and check ’em out!

8 things the happiest people do every day

University of California professor Sonja Lyubomirsky details the things research shows the happiest people have in common.

Via The How of Happiness:

  1. They devote a great amount of time to their family and friends, nurturing and enjoying those relationships.
  2. They are comfortable expressing gratitude for all they have.
  3. They are often the first to offer helping hands to coworkers and passersby.
  4. They practice optimism when imagining their futures.
  5. They savor life’s pleasures and try to live in the present moment.
  6. They make physical exercise a weekly and even daily habit.
  7. They are deeply committed to lifelong goals and ambitions (e.g., fighting fraud, building cabinets, or teaching their children their deeply held values).
  8. Last but not least, the happiest people do have their share of stresses, crises, and even tragedies. They may become just as distressed and emotional in such circumstances as you or I, but their secret weapon is the poise and strength they show in coping in the face of challenge.

I guess the blog post could end here. You’ve got your answer. But did you just want trivia? Or do you actually want to get happier?

The internet has become a firehose of ideas we never implement, tricks we forget to use.

Reading a list of things is easy. Implementing them in your life can be hard.

But it doesn’t have to be. Let’s get down to business.

“Happiness Subscriptions”

Here’s an interesting fact about happiness: frequency beats intensity. What’s that mean?

Lots of little good things make you happier than a handful of big things.

Research shows that going to church and exercising both bring people a disproportionate amount of happiness. Why?

They give us frequent, regular boosts.

Stanford professor Jennifer Aaker says it’s really that simple: the things that make you happy, do them more often.

We have designated work hours. We schedule doctor appointments. Heck, we even schedule hair appointments.

We say happiness is the most important thing but fail to consistently include it in our calendars.

Research shows 40% of happiness is due to intentional activity. You can change your happiness by up to 40% by what you choose to do every day.

And much of what you do, you do on autopilot. 40% of what you do every day isn’t the result of decisions, it’s due to habits.

Via The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business:

One paper published by a Duke University researcher in 2006 found that more than 40 percent of the actions people performed each day weren’t actual decisions, but habits.

See where I’m going with this?

Happy things need to be a habit. Part of your routine. Part of your schedule.

Stop waiting for random happy events, you need a “happiness subscription.”

So how do we take that list and make them things we actually do every day instead of more forgotten trivia? Let’s get started.

Wake up and say ARG!

Even scientific happiness advice is often corny. I’ll say that now so we can get it off the table…. But it works.

And this is why you might want to say ARG when you wake up. It’s an acronym that stands for:

  1. Anticipation
  2. Recollection
  3. Gratitude

I’ve written about the importance of a morning ritual and how research shows your mood in the morning affects your entire day. So start right.

Anticipation is a powerful happiness booster. It’s two for the price of one: you get the good thing and you get happy in anticipation of the good thing.

So think about what you’re looking forward to. Got nothing you’re looking forward to? Schedule something.

Recollecting great moments has a related effect. Memories allow us to relive the good times and kill stress.

Via The How of Happiness:

People prone to joyful anticipation, skilled at obtaining pleasure from looking forward and imagining future happy events, are especially likely to be optimistic and to experience intense emotions. In contrast, those proficient at reminiscing about the past—looking back on happy times, rekindling joy from happy memories—are best able to buffer stress.

And gratitude is arguably the king of happiness. What’s the research say? Can’t be more clear than this:

…the more a person is inclined to gratitude, the less likely he or she is to be depressed, anxious, lonely, envious, or neurotic.

And the combo often leads to optimism. Another powerful predictor of happiness.

So, corny as it may be, wake up and say ARG! And then do a quick bit of anticipation, recollection and gratitude.

(For more on optimism click here.)

All that’s fine and dandy. But what do you do once you’re out of bed?

Savor your morning coffee

Take a moment and really enjoy it. Smell it. Taste it. Appreciate it. Corny? Maybe.

But other research shows savoring — appreciating the good moments — is what separates the happiest people from the average Joe.

I imagine some of you are saying, “Well, I don’t drink coffee.” And please imagine me saying, “That’s not the point.”

It can be anything you do every morning.

And embedding savoring in our little daily rituals is powerful because studies show rituals matter.

Here’s Harvard professor Francesca Gino:

You can think about rituals that you yourself might engage in prior to consumption experiences. What they do, they make us a little bit more mindful about the consumption experience that we are about to have. Because of that, we end up savoring the food or whatever we are drinking more, we enjoy the experience more, and in fact, we’re also more willing to pay higher prices for whatever it is that we just consumed. Once again, rituals are beneficial in the sense that they create higher levels of enjoyment in the experience that we just had.

(For more on how savoring can make you happier click here.)

So what other habit can we build into our schedule that boosts joy? How about one that can make you as happy as sex does?

Sweat your way to joy

When you study people to see what makes them happiest you get three answers: sex, socializing and exercise.

Via Engineering Happiness: A New Approach for Building a Joyful Life:

Their findings confirm what had been found previously: happiness is high during sex, exercise, or socializing, or while the mind is focused on the here and now, and low during commuting or while the mind is wandering.

People who exercise are, across the board, mentally healthier: less depression, anger, stress, and distrust.

Via Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain:

A massive Dutch study of 19,288 twins and their families published in 2006 showed that exercisers are less anxious, less depressed, less neurotic, and also more socially outgoing. A Finnish study of 3,403 people in 1999 showed that those who exercise at least two to three times a week experience significantly less depression, anger, stress, and “cynical distrust” than those who exercise less or not at all.

Don’t like exercise? Then you’re doing the wrong kind.

Running, lifting weights, playing any sport… Find something you enjoy that gets you moving.

(For more on how sweating can increase smiling — and make you smarter too — click here.)

Okay, time to head to work. What’s the best thing to do when you start the day? It’s not about you — but it will make you happier.

The five-minute favor

Who lives to a ripe old age? Not those who get the most help, ironically it’s those who give the most help.

Via The Longevity Project: Surprising Discoveries for Health and Long Life from the Landmark Eight-Decade Study:

We figured that if a Terman participant sincerely felt that he or she had friends and relatives to count on when having a hard time then that person would be healthier. Those who felt very loved and cared for, we predicted, would live the longest. Surprise: our prediction was wrong . . . Beyond social network size, the clearest benefit of social relationships came from helping others. Those who helped their friends and neighbors, advising and caring for others, tended to live to old age.

And a great way to do that without taking up too much time is Adam Rifkin’s “5 Minute Favor”:

Every day, do something selfless for someone else that takes under five minutes. The essence of this thing you do should be that it makes a big difference to the person receiving the gift. Usually these favors take the form of an introduction, reference, feedback, or broadcast on social media.

So take five minutes to do something that is minor for you but would provide a big benefit to someone else.

It’s good karma — and science shows that, in some ways, karma is quite real.

Yes, some who do a lot for others get taken advantage of. But as Adam Grant of Wharton has shown, givers also succeed more:

Then I looked at the other end of the spectrum and said if Givers are at the bottom, who’s at the top? Actually, I was really surprised to discover, it’s the Givers again. The people who consistently are looking for ways to help others are over-represented not only at the bottom, but also at the top of most success metrics.

(For more on the best way to get happier by being a giver, click here.)

Alright, you have to start work for the day. Ugh. But there are ways that work can make you happier too.

Life is a game, and so is work

Like the research shows, the happiest people have goals.

Via Engineering Happiness: A New Approach for Building a Joyful Life:

In his studies, the psychologist Jonathan Freedman claimed that people with the ability to set objectives for themselves—both short-term and long-term—are happier. The University of Wisconsin neuroscientist Richard Davidson has found that working hard toward a goal and making progress to the point of expecting a goal to be realized don’t just activate positive feelings—they also suppress negative emotions such as fear and depression.

Many of us feel like work can be boring or annoying but the research shows many of us are actually happier at work than at home. Why?

Challenges. And we reach that state of “flow” only when a challenge presents itself. So how can work make us happier?

Three research-backed things to try:

  1. To the degree you can, do things you’re good at. We’re happier when we exercise our strengths.
  2. Make note of your progress. Nothing is more motivating than progress.
  3. Make sure to see the results of your work. This gives meaning to most any activity.

(For more on getting happier by setting goals click here.)

Enough work. You’ve got some free time. But what’s the happiest way to use your free time?

Friends get appointments, too

You have mandatory meetings in your schedule but not mandatory time with friends? Absurd.

One study says that as much as 70% of happiness comes from your relationships with other people.

Via The 100 Simple Secrets of Happy People:

Contrary to the belief that happiness is hard to explain, or that it depends on having great wealth, researchers have identified the core factors in a happy life. The primary components are number of friends, closeness of friends, closeness of family, and relationships with co-workers and neighbors. Together these features explain about 70 percent of personal happiness. – Murray and Peacock 1996

Why does church make people so happy? Studies show it has nothing to do with religion — it’s about the socializing. It’s scheduled friend time.

Via The Secrets of Happy Families: Improve Your Mornings, Rethink Family Dinner, Fight Smarter, Go Out and Play, and Much More:

After examining studies of more than three thousand adults, Chaeyoon Lin and Robert Putnam found that what religion you practice or however close you feel to God makes no difference in your overall life satisfaction. What matters is the number of friends you have in your religious community. Ten is the magic number; if you have that many, you’ll be happier. Religious people, in other words, are happier because they feel connected to a community of like-minded people.

And if you have the cash, pay for dinner with a friend. Money definitely can make you happier — when you spend it on other people.

Via Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending:

By the end of the day, individuals who spent money on others were measurably happier than those who spent money on themselves — even though there were no differences between the groups at the beginning of the day. And it turns out that the amount of money people found in their envelopes — $5 or $20 — had no effect on their happiness at the end of the day. How people spent the money mattered much more than how much of it they got.

Harvard professor and author of Happy Money: The Science of Smarter SpendingMichael Norton explains in his TED talk.

Don’t have the cash for that? No problem. Take turns paying. Duke professor Dan Ariely says this brings more happiness than always paying half.

(For more on how to have happy friendships click here.)

What’s the final thing happy people have in common? They cope with adversity. So what should we do when life gets tough?

Find meaning in hard times

Research shows that a happy life and a meaningful life are not necessarily the same thing.

It’s hard to be happy when tragedy strikes. But who lives longer and fares better after problems? Those who find benefit in their struggles.

Via The How of Happiness:

For example, in one study researchers interviewed men who had had heart attacks between the ages of thirty and sixty. Those who perceived benefits in the event seven weeks after it happened—for example, believing that they had grown and matured as a result, or revalued home life, or resolved to create less hectic schedules for themselves—were less likely to have recurrences and more likely to be healthy eight years later. In contrast, those who blamed their heart attacks on other people or on their own emotions (e.g., having been too stressed) were now in poorer health.

In many cases, Nietzsche was right: what does not kill us can make us stronger.

Via Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being:

A substantial number of people also show intense depression and anxiety after extreme adversity, often to the level of PTSD, but then they grow. In the long run, they arrive at a higher level of psychological functioning than before… In a month, 1,700 people reported at least one of these awful events, and they took our well-being tests as well. To our surprise, individuals who’d experienced one awful event had more intense strengths (and therefore higher well-being) than individuals who had none. Individuals who’d been through two awful events were stronger than individuals who had one, and individuals who had three— raped, tortured, and held captive for example— were stronger than those who had two.

So when you face adversity, always ask what you can learn from it.

(For more on how to make your life more meaningful — without terrible tragedy —  click here.)

See that? I took the eight things happy people do and squeezed them into just seven habits. You can thank me later.

Now how do we tie all of these happiness boosters together?

Sum up

If you want every day to be happier try including these seven things in your schedule:

  1. Wake Up And Say ARG!
  2. Savor Your Morning Coffee
  3. Sweat Your Way To Joy
  4. Do A Five Minute Favor
  5. Make Work A Game
  6. Friends Get Appointments Too
  7. Find Meaning In Hard Times

We’re all quick to say happiness is the most important thing… and then we schedule everything but the things that make us happiest. Huh?

So what’s going to make you happy today? Have you thought about it? Is it on your calendar?

Reading happiness information is useless trivia unless you use it and you won’t use it unless it’s part of your routine.

If happiness is the most important thing then make it the most important thing.

Join 85K+ readers. Get a free weekly update via email here.

Related posts:

What 10 things should you do every day to improve your life?

How To Make Your Life Better By Sending Five Simple Emails

4 Lifehacks From Ancient Philosophers That Will Make You Happier

This article originally appeared at Barking Up the Wrong Tree.

This article 8 things the happiest people do every day appeared first on Ladders.